The Appropriation of Islamic Philosophy : Creation in Ricoeur and Avicenna (Bloomsbury Studies in Continental Philosophy)

個数:
  • 予約
  • ポイントキャンペーン

The Appropriation of Islamic Philosophy : Creation in Ricoeur and Avicenna (Bloomsbury Studies in Continental Philosophy)

  • 現在予約受付中です。出版後の入荷・発送となります。
    重要:表示されている発売日は予定となり、発売が延期、中止、生産限定品で商品確保ができないなどの理由により、ご注文をお取消しさせていただく場合がございます。予めご了承ください。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 256 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781350570511

Full Description

Phenomenology and philosophical hermeneutics are today deepening their dialogue with ancient and medieval metaphysics.

Yet Islamic philosophy—typically relegated to a distant past—remains strikingly absent, despite its recognized impact on European thought. Making the case for a Ricoeurian hermeneutics of appropriation that revitalizes Avicenna's thinking for contemporary philosophy, The Appropriation of Islamic Philosophy develops a precise approach to the appropriation of Avicenna, exploring the tension between being and non-being at the heart of the notion of creation.

Attentive to theological and methodological differences, Selami Varlik brings the two philosophies into dialogue through their shared concern with putting belief in tension with rational discourse. The notion of creation, common to both religions, plays a pivotal role in this convergence, particularly through Avicenna's distinction between ontological creation and temporal creation. This duality echoes directly in medieval philosophy and more subtly in Ricoeur's distinction between origin and temporal beginning. It also allows Avicenna to articulate a notion of contingency, rooted in the distinction between essence and existence and revealing the ontological indigence of the created.

By establishing a shared conceptual language between both traditions, this work makes a vital contribution to the development of a living Islamic philosophy, transcending the scope of the two authors examined here.

Contents

Introduction

Part I: Necessity and Difficulties of Appropriation
A. Need for a Hermeneutical Approach
1. The Problem of Appropriation of Islamic Philosophy
2. Need for a Hermeneutics of Appropriation

B. Difficulties in the Appropriation Process
1. The Appropriation Process in Ricoeur
2. The Religious Obstacles

Part II: A Double Solution in Form and Content
A. Possibility of a Common Language
1. Proximity in Religious Belonging
2. Conceptual Distanciation in Common

B. Creation Ex Nihilo as a Shared Notion
1. Creation in Ricoeur
2. Creation in Avicenna

Part III: Appropriation as Innovation and Transformation
A. Creation and Semantic Innovation
1. Creation and Innovation in Avicenna
2. Innovation and Appropriation of Avicenna

B. Creation and Transformation of the Subject
1. Concomitance of the Cause and Ontological Indigence
2. Causality Against the Domination of the Subject

Conclusion
Bibliography
Index

最近チェックした商品