- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Religion / Ethics
Full Description
In these essays, Donald Wiebe unveils a significant problem in the academic study of religion in colleges and universities in North America and Europe - that studies almost always exhibit a religious bias. To explore this issue, Wiebe looks at the religious and moral agendas behind the study of religion, showing that the boundaries between the objective study of religion and religious education as a tool for bettering society have become blurred. As a result, he argues, religious studies departments have fostered an environment where religion has become a learned or scholarly practice, rather than the object of academic scrutiny.
This book provides a critical history of the failure of 20th- and 21st-century scholars to follow through on the 19th-century ideal of an objective scientific study of religious thought and behaviour. Although emancipated from direct ecclesiastical control and, to some extent, from sectarian theologizing, Wiebe argues that research and scholarship in the academic department of religious studies has failed to break free from religious constraints. He shows that an objective scientific study of religious thought and practice is not only possible, but the only appropriate approach to the study of religious phenomena.
Contents
Contents
Acknowledgments
List of Abbreviations
Introduction
Part One: Disenchantment with Science in the Academic Study of Religion
1 Including Religion in "Religious Studies"
2 Secular Theology Is Still Theology
3 Scientific Study of Religion and Its Cultured Despisers
4 Apologetic Modes of Theorizing
5 The Learned Practice of Religion in Canada
6 Affirming Religion in the History of Religious Studies
Part Two: Evidencing the Rejection of the Modern Epistemic Tradition
in the Study of Religion
7 Religion Thin and Thick
8 Incurably Religious: The AAR at Fifty-Five
9 American Influence on the Shape of Things to Come
10 Religious Studies in North America during the Cold War
11 The Desire for Moral Validation
Part Three: In Search of a Culture-Transcending Knowledge of Religions
and Religion
12 Removing Religion from the Study of Religion: A Nineteenth-Century
Innovation
13 Modernism and the Study of Religion
14 Rejecting a "Science-Lite" Study of Religion in the Modern University
Conclusion: Need Religious Studies Remain "Conspicuously Unscientific"?
Epilogue: Tending to Werblowsky's Concerns
Notes
References
Index
