フェミニズム法学が書き換える刑法の見解<br>Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions (Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions)

個数:

フェミニズム法学が書き換える刑法の見解
Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions (Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions)

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 425 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781316515112
  • DDC分類 345.73

Full Description

'Is it possible to be both a judge and a feminist?' Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions answers that question in the affirmative by re-writing seminal opinions that implicate critical dimensions of criminal law jurisprudence, from the sexual assault law to provocation to cultural defences to the death penalty. Right now, one in three Americans has a criminal record, mass incarceration and over-criminalization are the norm, and our jails cycle through about ten million people each year. At the same time, sexual assaults are rarely prosecuted at all, domestic violence remains pervasive, and the distribution of punishment, and by extension justice, seems not only raced and classed, but also gendered. We have had #MeToo campaigns and #SayHerName campaigns, and yet not enough has changed. How might all of justice look different through a feminist lens. This book answers that question.

Contents

Introduction and Overview; Part I. Gendered Justice: 1. McQuirter v. State; Commentary: Grayce Zelphine; Judgment: Cortney Lollar; 2. People v. Berry; Commentary: Carolyn B. Ramsey; Judgment: Susan D. Rozelle; 3. Coker v. Georgia; Commentary: Catherine M. Grosso and Barbara O'Brien; 4. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe; Commentary: Adam Crepelle; Judgment: Melissa L. Tatum; 5. State v. Rusk; Commentary: JoAnne Sweeny: Judgement Michelle J. Anderson; 6. People v. Wu; Commentary: John Felipe Acevedo; Judgment: Leti Volpp; 7. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Bigfire; Commentary: Anne E. Tweedy; Judgment: Sarah Deer; 8. Commonwealth v. Blache; Commentary: Marie-Amélie George; Judgement: Ben A. McJunkin; Part II. Gender on Trial; 9. State v. Williams; Commentary: Kim Hai Pearson; Judgment: Addie C. Rolnick; 10. State v. Walden; Commentary: Lisa R. Avalos; Judgement: Sarah L. Swan; 11. State v. Norman; Commentary: Joan H. Krause; Judgment: Martha R. Mahoney; 12. Whitner v. State; Commentary: Ruqaiijah Yearby; Judgment: Aziza Ahmed; 13. United States v. Nwoye; Commentary: Sherri Lee Keene; Judgment: Mary D. Fan; 14. Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon; Commentary: Aya Gruber and Kate Mogulescu; Judgment: I. India Thusi.

最近チェックした商品