- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Philosophy
Full Description
The word 'rationality' and its cognates, like 'reason', have multiple contexts and connotations. Rational calculation can be contrasted with rational interpretation. There is the rationality of proof and of persuasion, of tradition and of the criticism of tradition. Rationalism (and rationalists) can be reasonable or unreasonable. Reason is sometimes distinguished from revelation, superstition, convention, prejudice, emotion, and chance, but all of these also involve reasoning. In politics, three views of rationality - economic, moral, and historical - have been especially important, often defining approaches to politics and political theory such as utilitarianism and rational choice theory. These approaches privilege positive or natural law, responsibilities, or human rights, and emphasize the importance of culture and tradition, and therefore meaning and context.
This book explores the understanding of rationality in politics and the relations between different approaches to rationality. Among the topics considered are the limits of rationality, the role of imagination and emotion in politics, the meaning of political realism, the nature of political judgment, and the relationship between theory and practice. This book was originally published as a special issue of Global Discourse.
Contents
Introduction: Rationality in politics and its limits 1. Political philosophy and the attraction of realism Reply - Realism and imagination: a response to Kelly 2. Hobbes and human irrationality Reply - Sovereigns and citizens: a response to Field 3. Reason, statecraft and the art of war: a politique reassessment Reply - Morality and contingency: a response to Jones 4. Thumos and rationality in Plato's Republic Reply - Argument and imagination: a reply to Tarnopolsky 5. 'A habitual disposition to the good': on reason, virtue and realism Reply - Reason, faith and modernity: a response to Pabst 6. Oakeshott on theory and practice Reply - Oakeshott on the theory-practice problem: a reply to Terry Nardin 7. Franz Jägerstätter as social critic Reply - The social critic and universal morality: a response to Finn Rebuttal to Roff
