Validation of Score Meaning for the Next Generation of Assessments : The Use of Response Processes (Ncme Applications of Educational Measurement and Assessment)

個数:
電子版価格
¥0
  • 電子版あり

Validation of Score Meaning for the Next Generation of Assessments : The Use of Response Processes (Ncme Applications of Educational Measurement and Assessment)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 156 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781138898370
  • DDC分類 371.2601

Full Description

Despite developments in research and practice on using examinee response process data in assessment design, the use of such data in test validation is rare. Validation of Score Meaning in the Next Generation of Assessments Using Response Processes highlights the importance of validity evidence based on response processes and provides guidance to measurement researchers and practitioners in creating and using such evidence as a regular part of the assessment validation process. Response processes refer to approaches and behaviors of examinees when they interpret assessment situations and formulate and generate solutions as revealed through verbalizations, eye movements, response times, or computer clicks. Such response process data can provide information about the extent to which items and tasks engage examinees in the intended ways.

With contributions from the top researchers in the field of assessment, this volume includes chapters that focus on methodological issues and on applications across multiple contexts of assessment interpretation and use. In Part I of this book, contributors discuss the framing of validity as an evidence-based argument for the interpretation of the meaning of test scores, the specifics of different methods of response process data collection and analysis, and the use of response process data relative to issues of validation as highlighted in the joint standards on testing. In Part II, chapter authors offer examples that illustrate the use of response process data in assessment validation. These cases are provided specifically to address issues related to the analysis and interpretation of performance on assessments of complex cognition, assessments designed to inform classroom learning and instruction, and assessments intended for students with varying cultural and linguistic backgrounds.

The Open Access version of this book, available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

Contents

Contents

Contributors

1. Introduction

Kadriye Ercikan and James W. Pellegrino

Part I. Conceptual & Methodological Issues Associated with Using Examinee Response Process Data to Validate Score Meaning

2. Validating Score Interpretations Based on Response Processes

Michael Kane & Robert Mislevy

3. Collecting and Analyzing Verbal Response Process Data in the Service of Interpretative and Validity Arguments

Jacqueline P. Leighton

4. Collecting, Analyzing and Interpreting Response time, Eye-tracking, and Log data

Andreas Oranje, Joanna Gorin, Yue Jia, Deirdre Kerr

5. Commentary I

Lauress L. Wise

Part II. Using Examinee Response Process Data to Validate Score Meaning: Applications in Different Assessment Contexts

6. Assessments of Complex Thinking

Paul Nichols and Kristen Huff

7. Threats to Score Meaning in Automated Scoring

Isaac I. Bejar

8. The Contribution of Student Response Processes to Validity Analyses for Instructionally Supportive Assessments

Louis V. DiBello, James W. Pellegrino, Brian D. Gane, & Susan R. Goldman

9. Score Processes in Assessing Academic Content of Non-native Speakers

Rebecca J. Kopriva and Laura Wright

10. Assessment of Students with Learning Disabilities: Using Students' Performance and Progress to Inform Instruction

Gerald Tindal, Julie Alonzo, Leilani Sáez, and Joseph F. T. Nese

11. Multiple Language Versions of Tests

Guillermo Solano-Flores and Magda Chía

12. Commentary 2: The Value of Response Process Studies to Evaluate Score Meaning

Suzanne Lane

Index

最近チェックした商品