Experimental Comparisons of Usability Evaluation Methods : A Special Issue of Human-Computer Interaction

個数：

ポイントキャンペーン

Experimental Comparisons of Usability Evaluation Methods : A Special Issue of Human-Computer Interaction

Olson, Gary A. (EDT)

ウェブストア価格 ¥54,158（本体¥49,235）
CRC Press（2020/12発売）
外貨定価 US$ 245.00
【ウェブストア限定】洋書・洋古書ポイント5倍対象商品（～2/28）
ポイント 2,460pt

在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
通常6～9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版／ページ数 144 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9781138432949
DDC分類 004.019

Full Description

This special issue contains essays regarding the CHI '95 conference, which featured a panel titled, Discount or Disservice? Discount Usability Analysis: Evaluation at a Bargain Price or Simply Damaged Merchandise? Wayne Gray, who organized the panel, presented a controversial critique of studies that had evaluated various usability evaluation methods (UEMs). The level of interest in this discussion led Gray to propose a review article that dealt with the issues in a more systematic fashion. The resulting essay, written by Gray and his collaborator Marilyn Salzman, conducted an in-depth review of a series of influential studies that used experimental methods to compare a variety of UEMs. Gray and Salzman's analysis was framed using Cook and Campbell's (1979) well-known discussion of various forms of validity. They used this to evaluate numerous details of these comparative studies, and they concluded that the studies fell short on the criteria by which good experimental studies are designed and interpreted.

1. OVERVIEW -- 2. INTRODUCTION -- 3. THE UNIQUE ROLE AND BURDEN OF EXPERIMENTS IN EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION -- 4. THREATS TO THE VALIDITY OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES -- 4.1. Cause-Effect Issues -- Statistical Conclusion Validity -- Internal Validity -- 4.2. Generality Issues -- Construct Validity -- External Validity -- 4.3. Conclusion Validity -- 4.4. Summary: Threats to Validity of Experimental Studies -- 5. THREATS TO THE VALIDITY OF FIVE INFLUENTIAL UEM STUDIES -- 5.1. Jeffries, Miller, Wharton, and Uyeda (1991) -- Overview -- Statistical Conclusion Validity -- Internal Validity -- Construct Validity -- External Validity -- Conclusion Validity -- Summary of the Review of Jeffries et al. (1991) -- 5.2. Karat, Campbell, and Fiegel (1992) -- Overview -- Statistical Conclusion Validity -- Internal Validity -- Construct Validity -- External Validity -- Conclusion Validity -- Summary of the Review of Karat et al. (1992) -- 5.3. Nielsen (1992) -- Overview -- Evaluation -- Statistical Conclusion Validity -- Internal Validity -- Construct Validity -- Conclusion Validity -- Summary of the Review of Nielsen ( 1992) -- 5.4. Desurvire, Kondziela, and Atwood (1992) -- Overview -- Statistical Conclusion Validity: Sample Size -- Internal Validity: Selection -- Construct Validity and External Validity -- Summary of the Review of Desurvire et al. ( 1992) -- 5.5. Nielsen and Phillips (1993) -- Overview -- Statistical Conclusion Validity -- Internal Validity -- Construct Validity and External Validity -- Conclusion Validity -- Summary of the Review of Nielsen and Phillips (1993) -- 5.6. Summary of the Reviews -- 6. OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- 6.1. Predicting and Measuring Usability: Effect Construct Validity -- Hits, False Alarms, Misses, and Correct Rejections -- Tokens, Types, and Categories of Usability Problems -- Convergent Measures -- Effect Construct Validity: Recommendations -- 6.2. Recommendations for Addressing the Four Types of Validity -- Stati