Delusion and Confabulation : A Special Issue of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science)

個数:

Delusion and Confabulation : A Special Issue of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 376 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781032920887
  • DDC分類 616.89

Full Description

People with psychiatric and neurological illness sometimes say and think the most amazing things. They might believe they are dead; claim to see, despite being blind; or "remember" things that never happened. Historical demarcations between academic disciplines dictate that these are distinct clinical phenomena - 'delusion', 'anosognosia' (the delusional denial of illness on some accounts) or 'confabulation'. This Special Issue brings together leading researchers from diverse fields - memory researchers, clinical neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, cognitive scientists and philosophers - to consider the extent to which these different phenomena overlap. Opinions differ. Some researchers use the term confabulation very generally to refer to false claims whether these concern belief or memory. Other researchers advocate an exclusive approach, according to which no symptom could ever qualify as both delusional and confabulatory. Yet others focus on points of similarity and argue that historical discord between psychodynamic and cognitive neuroscientific approaches has obscured similarities with regard the roles of emotion and motivation. Some contributors highlight both difference and similarity; they consider points of overlap - the instances of confabulation which qualify as delusional - or advocate a common monitoring framework to explain all distortions of reality. Despite their differing views, our contributors all share the common aims of clarifying theoretical conceptions, evaluating similarities and differences, and learning more about underlying causal mechanisms so as to advance the cognitive neuropsychiatry of both delusion and confabulation.

Contents

R. Langdon, M. Turner, Delusion and Confabulation: Overlapping or Distinct Distortions of Reality? M.D. Kopelman, Varieties of Confabulation and Delusion. A. Fotopoulou, The Affective Neuropsychology of Confabulation and Delusion. K. Metcalf, R. Langdon, M. Coltheart, The Role of Personal Biases in the Explanation of Confabulation. G. Dalla Barba, M.F. Boissé, Temporal Consciousness and Confabulation: Is the Medial Temporal Lobe "Temporal"? A.R. O'Connor, C. Lever, C.J.A. Moulin, Novel Insights into False Recollection: A Model of Déjà Vécu. A. Gilboa, Strategic Retrieval, Confabulations and Delusions: Theory and Data. V.J. Carr, Beauty and Belief: William James and the Aesthetics of Delusions in Schizophrenia. R.E. Cox, A.J. Barnier, Hypnotic Illusions and Clinical Delusions: Hypnosis as a Research Method. W. Hirstein, The Misidentification Syndromes as Mindreading Disorders. M. Coltheart, P. Menzies, J. Sutton, Abductive Inference and Delusional Belief. R. McKay, M. Kinsbourne, Motivational Factors and False Claims. R. Langdon, T. Bayne, Delusion and Confabulation: Mistakes of Perceiving, Remembering and Believing. M. Turner, M. Coltheart, Confabulation and Delusion: A Common Monitoring Framework?

最近チェックした商品