Markets with Limits : How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate

個数:

Markets with Limits : How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 220 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9781032171487
  • DDC分類 174.4

Full Description

In Markets with Limits James Stacey Taylor argues that current debates over the moral limits of markets have derailed. He argues that they focus on a market-critical position that almost nobody holds: That certain goods and services can be freely given away but should never be bought or sold. And he argues that they focus on a type of argument for this position that there is reason to believe that nobody holds: That trade in certain goods or services is wrongful solely because of what it would communicate.

Taylor puts the debates over the moral limits of markets back on track. He develops a taxonomy of the positions that are actually held by critics of markets, and clarifies the role played in current moral and political philosophy by arguments that justify (or condemn) certain actions owing in part to what they communicate. Taylor argues that the debates have derailed because they were conducted in accord with market, rather than academic, norms—and that this demonstrates that market thinking should not govern academic research. Markets with Limits concludes with suggestions as to how to encourage academics to conduct research in accord with academic norms and hence improve its quality.

Key features




Provides original suggestions concerning how to improve the exegetical quality of academic research



Systematically identifies the primary exegetical errors—and the ways in which these errors have adversely influenced current debates—that Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski made in their influential book, Markets Without Limits



Argues that despite the current, widespread view that semiotic objections to markets are widespread in the literature, they are in actuality rare to nonexistent



Offers an up-to-date taxonomy of the current arguments in the various debates over both the ontological and the moral limits of markets



Provides an extensive overview of mistaken claims that have been made and propagated in various academic literatures

Contents

Introduction 1. The Magical Asymmetry Thesis 2. Semiotic Objections to Markets 3. Sandel, Semiotics, and Money-Based Exchange 4. Sex, Surrogacy, Semiotics, and Spheres: Anderson on Market Exchange 5. Walzer, Satz, Archard and Semiotics 6. Expressivist Arguments 7. What We Talk About When We Talk About the Limits of Markets 8. Why Good Academics Produce Bad Research: Academic Incentives, Woozles, and Hoaxes 9. Market Norms and Academic Norms 10. The Theory and Practice of Changing Norms Conclusion

最近チェックした商品