Full Description
Explores the contexts of judges' decision making in juvenile courts that incarcerate disproportionately more minorities than whites.
An in-depth examination of the contextual nature of decision making and the causes of disproportionate minority confinement in four relatively homogenous juvenile courts in Iowa, this book explores the subjective social psychological processes of juvenile court officers and the factors that influence those processes. Iowa, although a state with a predominantly white population, has one of the highest minority incarceration rates for juveniles. Michael J. Leiber focuses on the relationships between adherence to correctional orientations (such as retribution and rehabilitation) and decision-makers' views concerning race, crime, family, and respect for authority with judgments and differential outcomes for youth. Quantitative and qualitative methodologies are used to determine the extent to which correctional ideologies and decision-makers' stereotyping of minorities are fueled by a wide range of contingencies, the impact of case processing and outcomes of whites, African Americans, and Native Americans, and how it varies by jurisdiction.
Contents
Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgments
1. Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC)
2. Understanding DMC
3. Correctional Orientations, Race, Crime, Family, and Respect for Authority
4. Methods
5. Movement through the Juvenile Justice System
6. The Influence of Legal and Extralegal Factors on Decision Making
7. Accountability and Intervention
8. Rehabilitation, Protection of Society, and Adherence to Middle-Class Values
9. Formal Rationalized Justice and Nonintervention
10. Dysfunctional Family, Subcultural Values, Lack of Resources, and Rehabilitation
11. Summary and Conclusions
Appendixes
Notes
Bibliography
Index
![Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency. [edited by Sir James M. Campbell. General Index, by R. E. Enthoven.] -- Paperback / softback](../images/goods/../parts/goods-list/no-phooto.jpg)
