Deciding to Leave : The Politics of Retirement from the United States Supreme Court (Suny series in American Constitutionalism)

個数:
  • ポイントキャンペーン

Deciding to Leave : The Politics of Retirement from the United States Supreme Court (Suny series in American Constitutionalism)

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 358 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780791456514
  • DDC分類 347.732634

基本説明

The first sustained examination of the process by which justices elect to leave the United States Supreme Court.

Full Description

The first sustained examination of the process by which justices elect to leave the United States Supreme Court.

While much has been written on Supreme Court appointments, Deciding to Leave provides the first systematic look at the process by which justices decide to retire from the bench, and why this has become increasingly partisan in recent years. Since 1954, generous retirement provisions and decreasing workloads have allowed justices to depart strategically when a president of their own party occupies the White House. Otherwise, the justices remain in their seats, often past their ability to effectively participate in the work of the Court. While there are benefits and drawbacks to various reform proposals, Ward argues that mandatory retirement goes farthest in combating partisanship and protecting the institution of the Court.

Contents

List of Illustrations and Tables


Preface


1. The Politics of Departure in the U.S. Supreme Court




Departure in Comparative Perspective
Departure Politics in Historical Context
Overview


2. 1789-1800: Traveling Postboys


Indisposition and the Early Supreme Court
Disagreeable Tours
Conclusion


3. 1801-1868: Crippled Courts


Army of Judges
Imminent Danger of Sudden Death
Needy and Half-Paid Men
Abridgement of Tenure, Facility of Removal, or Some Other Modification
If Mr. Clay Had Been Elected
Overview


4. 1869-1896: Old Imbeciles on the Bench


Dangerous in its Operation
1869 Retirement Act
The Disputed Election of 1876
The Evarts Act
Conclusion


5. 1897-1936: Old Fools and Young Spirits


The Field Effect
Evarts Act Redux
Increased Caseloads
Conclusion


6. 1937-1954: Senior Status


A War with a Fool at the Top
1937 Retirement Act
Untimely Deaths
Conclusion


7. 1954-1970: The Limits of Power


1954 Retirement Act
Cantankerous Fellows
An Extraconstitutional Arrangement
Conclusion


8. 1971-1999: Appointed for Life


He Ought to Get Off the Court Too
Old and Coming Apart
Conclusion


9. 2000-Present: A Self-Inflicted Wound


The Disputed Election of 2000
That's For Me to Know and You to Find Out
Conclusion


10. Conclusion: Imaginary Danger?


Ability and Inability
The Rule of 100
Lightening the Burden
Mandatory Retirement
Conclusion


Appendix A


Letter from Byron White to Warren Burger, Oct. 20, 1975


Appendix B


Letter from Warren E. Burger, William J. Brennan, Jr., Potter Stewart, Byron R. White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry A. Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, and William H. Rehnquist to William O. Douglas, December 22, 1975


Appendix C


Letter from John Paul Stevens to William H. Rehnquist, October 28, 1988


Notes


Bibliography


Index

最近チェックした商品