- ホーム
- > 洋書
- > 英文書
- > Politics / International Relations
Full Description
Citizens in democracies complain that political parties' positions on major issues are too ambiguous for them to confidently understand. Why is party position ambiguity so common? Are party positions ambiguous because political parties fail in forming clear policies or because they deliberately blur their positions? Rationality of Irrationality argues that political parties are motivated to strategically blur their position on an issue when they struggle with a certain disadvantage in the issue. Specifically, political parties present an ambiguous position when their own supporters are divided in their stances on the issue. A political party also blurs position stances when voters do not acknowledge that the party has the ability and integrity to solve problems related to the issue. Political parties blur their position in these cases because ambiguous party positions divert voters' attention from the issue. Voters support a political party whose policy positions on major issues are close to their own stances. However, voters cannot confidently and exactly estimate party positions on an issue when they are only ambiguous.
Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Abbreviations
1. Introduction
2. A Theory of Position Blurring
3. Measuring Position Blurring
4. Position Blurring and Voter Behavior
5. Issue Disadvantage, Party Competition Environment, and Issue Avoidance
6. Radical Right-Wing Parties' Position Blurring on the Economy
7. Social Democratic Parties' Position Blurring on Immigration
8. Concluding Remarks
Appendix
References
