仏教徒、バラモンと信仰:南アジア宗教哲学の認識論<br>Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief : Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion

個数:

仏教徒、バラモンと信仰:南アジア宗教哲学の認識論
Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief : Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 328 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780231132800
  • DDC分類 121

基本説明

New in paperback. Hardcover was published in 2005. Examines how the Brahmanical tradition of Pürva Mīmamsa and the writings of the seventh-century Buddhist Madhyamika philosopher Candrakīrti challenged dominant Indian Buddhist views of epistemology.

Full Description

In Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief, Dan Arnold examines how the Brahmanical tradition of Purva Mimamsa and the writings of the seventh-century Buddhist Madhyamika philosopher Candrakirti challenged dominant Indian Buddhist views of epistemology. Arnold retrieves these two very different but equally important voices of philosophical dissent, showing them to have developed highly sophisticated and cogent critiques of influential Buddhist epistemologists such as Dignaga and Dharmakirti. His analysis-developed in conversation with modern Western philosophers like William Alston and J. L. Austin-offers an innovative reinterpretation of the Indian philosophical tradition, while suggesting that pre-modern Indian thinkers have much to contribute to contemporary philosophical debates. In logically distinct ways, Purva Mimamsa and Candrakirti's Madhyamaka opposed the influential Buddhist school of thought that emphasized the foundational character of perception. Arnold argues that Mimamsaka arguments concerning the "intrinsic validity" of the earliest Vedic scriptures are best understood as a critique of the tradition of Buddhist philosophy stemming from Dignaga.
Though often dismissed as antithetical to "real philosophy," Mimamsaka thought has affinities with the reformed epistemology that has recently influenced contemporary philosophy of religion. Candrakirti's arguments, in contrast, amount to a principled refusal of epistemology. Arnold contends that Candrakirti marshals against Buddhist foundationalism an approach that resembles twentieth-century ordinary language philosophy-and does so by employing what are finally best understood as transcendental arguments. The conclusion that Candrakirti's arguments thus support a metaphysical claim represents a bold new understanding of Madhyamaka.

Contents

Acknowledgments Introduction: On the Rational Reconstruction of South Asian Philosophy Part I: Buddhist Foundationalism 1. Dignaga's Transformation of Buddhist Abhidharma 2. The Problems with Buddhist Foundationalism Part II: The Reformed Epistemology of Purva Mimamsa 3. Nobody Is Seen Going to Heaven: Toward an Epistemology That Supports the Authority of the Vedas 4. Are the Vedas Are Intrinsically True? Prima Facie Justification and the Mimasaka Critique of Buddhist Foundationalism Part III: The Metaphysical Arguments of Madhyamaka 5. A Philosophical Grammar for the Study of Madhyamaka 6. Candrakirti Against Bare Particulars: An Expression of Madhyamika Metaphysics 7. Is It Really True That Everything Is Empty? Candrakirti on Essencelessness as the Essence of Things Conclusion: Justification and Truth, Relativism and Pragmatism: Some Lessons for Religious Studies Notes References Index

最近チェックした商品