The Opinionated University : Academic Freedom, Diversity, and the Myth of Neutrality in American Higher Education

個数:
  • 予約

The Opinionated University : Academic Freedom, Diversity, and the Myth of Neutrality in American Higher Education

  • 現在予約受付中です。出版後の入荷・発送となります。
    重要:表示されている発売日は予定となり、発売が延期、中止、生産限定品で商品確保ができないなどの理由により、ご注文をお取消しさせていただく場合がございます。予めご了承ください。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 240 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780226846156
  • DDC分類 378.12130973

Full Description

Why institutional neutrality is nothing but an illusion.
 
Can a university ever truly be neutral in today's social and political climate? Pushing against the tide of universities increasingly pledging to stay neutral about contentious issues, law professor Brian Soucek argues that their promises are doomed to fail—universities can't help being opinionated.

In The Opinionated University, Soucek shows that neutrality is a myth by taking a deep dive into several prominent campus controversies of the day, including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts and restrictions on campus speech and protest. Each issue requires universities to choose a side in what they do, if not also in what they say. In everything from curricular and admissions decisions to their response to outside rankings and their evaluation of faculty, universities express the values at the heart of their mission. Soucek argues that those pushing for neutrality are only preventing universities from standing up for their values, whether in today's current moment of crisis or in periods of political calm.

Both timely and deeply engaging, The Opinionated University calls on universities to dispense with neutrality as a governing principle and focus instead on what their mission should be, and who should determine it.  
 

Contents

Introduction: The Myth of Neutrality

1. Diversity Statements: A Performance Evaluation, Not a Litmus Test
Loyalty Oaths
Viewpoint Discrimination
Academic Freedom
Race Discrimination

2. Distraction and Hypocrisy: Ignoring the Real Threats to Academic Freedom
Student Teaching Evaluations
The Rankings Racket

3. Institutional Speech: Silence Is Not Always Silent
Kalvenist Missionaries
Is Neutrality Possible?
Areas of Agreement
Department Statements

4. Institutional Counterspeech: "The Remedy for Speech That Is False Is Speech That Is True"
Countering Inequality
Countering Other Speech

5. Regulating Campus Speech: When More Speech Isn't Necessarily Better
Quad Speech
Classroom Speech

Coda: Who Should Decide a University's Opinions?

Acknowledgments
Notes
Index

最近チェックした商品