米国の憲法法理にみる条約の優越性の終焉<br>The Death of Treaty Supremacy : An Invisible Constitutional Change

個数:

米国の憲法法理にみる条約の優越性の終焉
The Death of Treaty Supremacy : An Invisible Constitutional Change

  • オンデマンド(OD/POD)版です。キャンセルは承れません。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 472 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780199364022
  • DDC分類 327.73

Full Description

This book provides the first detailed history of the Constitution's treaty supremacy rule. It describes a process of invisible constitutional change. The treaty supremacy rule was a bedrock principle of constitutional law for more than 150 years. It provided that treaties are supreme over state law and that courts have a constitutional duty to apply treaties that conflict with state laws. The rule ensured that state governments did not violate U.S. treaty obligations without authorization from the federal political branches. In 1945, the United States ratified the UN Charter, which obligates nations to promote human rights for all without distinction as to race. In 1950, a California court applied the Charters human rights provisions along with the traditional supremacy rule to invalidate a state law that discriminated against Japanese nationals. The implications were shocking: the decision implied that the United States had abrogated Jim Crow laws throughout the South by ratifying the UN Charter. Conservatives reacted by lobbying for a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, to abolish the treaty supremacy rule. The amendment never passed, but Bricker's supporters achieved their goals through de facto constitutional change. Before 1945, the treaty supremacy rule was a mandatory constitutional rule that applied to all treaties. The de facto Bricker Amendment converted the rule into an optional rule that applies only to self-executing treaties. Under the modern rule, state governments are allowed to violate national treaty obligationsincluding international human rights obligationsthat are embodied in non-self-executing treaties.

Contents

List of Tables

Acknowledgments

Introduction

Part One: Treaty Supremacy at the Founding

Chapter One: The Origins of Treaty Supremacy, 1776-1787

Chapter Two: State Ratification Debates

Chapter Three: Treaty Supremacy in the 1790s

Part Two: Treaty Supremacy from 1800 to 1945

Chapter Four: Foster v. Neilson

Chapter Five: Treaties and State Law

Chapter Six: Self-Execution in the Political Branches

Chapter Seven: Self-Execution in the Federal Courts

Chapter Eight: Seeds of Change

Part Three: The Human Rights Revolution

Chapter Nine: Human Rights Activism in the United States: 1946-48

Chapter Ten: The Nationalists Strike Back: 1949-51

Chapter Eleven: Fujii, Brown and Bricker: 1952-54

Chapter Twelve: Business as Usual in the Courts: 1946-65

Chapter Thirteen: The American Law Institute and the Restatement of Foreign Relations Law

Part Four: Treaty Supremacy and Constitutional Change

Chapter Fourteen: Treaty Supremacy in the 21st Century

Chapter Fifteen: Invisible Constitutional Change

List of Abbreviations Used in Endnotes

Endnotes

Bibliography

Index