前近代の医療における男性の進出<br>Making Women's Medicine Masculine : The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology

個数:

前近代の医療における男性の進出
Making Women's Medicine Masculine : The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 432 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780199211494
  • DDC分類 618.1009

基本説明

The first general history of women's medicine in premodern Europe ever written, based on a comprehensive survey of over 150 texts on women's medicine written prior to 1600, including both Latin and vernacular texts.

Full Description

Making Women's Medicine Masculine challenges the common belief that prior to the eighteenth century men were never involved in any aspect of women's healthcare in Europe. Using sources ranging from the writings of the famous twelfth-century female practitioner, Trota of Salerno, all the way to the great tomes of Renaissance male physicians, and covering both medicine and surgery, this study demonstrates that men slowly established more and more authority in diagnosing and prescribing treatments for women's gynaecological conditions (especially infertility) and even certain obstetrical conditions.

Even if their 'hands-on' knowledge of women's bodies was limited by contemporary mores, men were able to establish their increasing authority in this and all branches of medicine due to their greater access to literacy and the knowledge contained in books, whether in Latin or the vernacular. As Monica Green shows, while works written in French, Dutch, English, and Italian were sometimes addressed to women, nevertheless even these were often re-appropriated by men, both by practitioners who treated women and by laymen interested to learn about the 'secrets' of generation.

While early in the period women were considered to have authoritative knowledge on women's conditions (hence the widespread influence of the alleged authoress 'Trotula'), by the end of the period to be a woman was no longer an automatic qualification for either understanding or treating the conditions that most commonly afflicted the female sex - with implications of women's exclusion from production of knowledge on their own bodies extending to the present day.

Contents

Preface ; Introduction: literacy, medicine, and gender ; 1. The gentle hand of a woman? Trota and women's medicine at Salerno ; 2. Men's practice of women's medicine in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries ; 3. Bruno's paradox: women and literate medicine ; 4. In a language women understand: the gender of the vernacular ; 5. Slander and the secrets of women ; 6. The masculine birth of gynaecology ; The medieval legacy: medicine of, for, and by women ; Appendix I: medieval and Renaissance owners of Trotula manuscripts ; Printed gynaecological and obstetrical texts, 1474-1600 ; References ; Index of manuscripts cited ; General Index

最近チェックした商品