企業の道義的責任<br>The Moral Responsibility of Firms

個数:

企業の道義的責任
The Moral Responsibility of Firms

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 248 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780198857051
  • DDC分類 174.4

Full Description

Individuals are generally considered morally responsible for their actions. Who or what is responsible when those individuals become part of business organizations? Can we correctly ascribe moral responsibility to the organization itself? If so, what are the grounds for this claim and to what extent do the individuals also remain morally responsible? If not, does moral responsibility fall entirely to specific individuals within the organization and can they be readily identified?

A perennial question in business ethics has concerned the extent to which business organizations can be correctly said to have moral responsibilities and obligations. In philosophical terms, this is a question of "corporate moral agency." Whether firms can be said to be moral agents and have the capacity for moral responsibility has significant practical consequences. In most legal systems in the world, business firms are recognized as "persons" with the ability to own property, to maintain and defend lawsuits, and to self-organize governance structures. However to recognize that these "business persons" can also act morally or immorally as organizations would justify the imposition of other legal constraints and normative expectations on organizations. In the criminal law, for example, the idea that an organized firm may itself have criminal culpability is accepted in many countries (such as the United States) but rejected in others (such as Germany).

This book presents contributions by leading business scholars in business ethics, philosophy, and related disciplines to extend our understanding of the "moral responsibility" of firms.

Contents

Thomas Donaldson: Preface
Introduction
N. Craig Smith: The Moral Responsibility of Firms: Renewed Interest in a Perennial Question of Business Ethics
Part One
1: Philip Pettit: The Conversable, Responsible Corporation
2: Michael E. Bratman: The Intentions of a Group
3: Peter A. French: The Diachronic Moral Responsibility of Firm
4: Waheed Hussain and Joakim Sandberg: Normative Functionalism about Corporate Moral Agency
Part Two
5: John Hasnas: The Phantom Menace of the Responsibility Deficit
6: Ian Maitland: How Corporate Responsibility Undermines True Responsibility
7: David Rönnegard and Manuel Velasquez: On (Not) Attributing Moral Responsibility to Organizations
8: Amy J. Sepinwall: Blame, Emotion, and the Corporation
Part Three
9: Kendy Hess: The Unrecognized Consensus about Firm Moral Responsibility
10: Nien-hê Hsieh: Corporate Moral Agency, Positive Duties, and Purpose
Conclusion
Eric W. Orts: The Moral Responsibility of Firms: Past, Present, and Future

最近チェックした商品