多文化主義の倫理:マイノリティの権利を考える<br>Debating Multiculturalism : Should There be Minority Rights? (Debating Ethics)

個数:

多文化主義の倫理:マイノリティの権利を考える
Debating Multiculturalism : Should There be Minority Rights? (Debating Ethics)

  • 在庫がございません。海外の書籍取次会社を通じて出版社等からお取り寄せいたします。
    通常6~9週間ほどで発送の見込みですが、商品によってはさらに時間がかかることもございます。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合がございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合、分割発送となる場合がございます。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 320 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780197528372
  • DDC分類 305.8

Full Description

Multiculturalism has become a political touchstone in many countries around the world. While many of those on the right oppose it, and many of those on the left embrace it, things are not this simple. For those who defend them, multicultural policies are generally seen as key to the fair and successful integration of minorities, many of whom are immigrants, into diverse democratic societies. For those who oppose multiculturalism, who have become part of the so-called "backlash" against multiculturalism, they are charged with generating segregation rather than inclusion, undermining national cultures, reinforcing difference, and privileging minority groups.

Around the world, we see failing attempts at migrant integration, persistent religious intolerance and racial and ethnic discrimination, resurgent national minorities, emboldened majorities, permanent minorities, continuing social isolation, and increasing extremism, including in the form of white nationalism. But is multiculturalism the solution to these problems or does it just make them worse?

In this for-and-against book, two prominent scholars of multiculturalism put forward different answers to this important question. While Patti Tamara Lenard argues for minority rights as both the consequence of a right to culture and a way to redress the effects of nation-building, Peter Balint rejects minority rights altogether, instead arguing for a re-imagined liberal neutrality. This theoretical disagreement plays out in real-world policy disagreement. Lenard, for example, argues strongly in favor of exemptions from general rules for minority cultures including the right of Sikhs to be exempt from helmet laws, and for Jews and Muslims to be exempt from bans on male circumcision. She also defends the right of minority cultures to have government-supported separate spaces. Balint, on the other hand, argues directly against these types of exemptions and government support. He is opposed to any form of differentiation based on culture, religion, or ethnicity. The book uses a wide range of real-world examples to demonstrate their significant theoretical disagreement, and to recommend very different policy proposals.

Contents

Introduction: Multiculturalism and Minority Rights
Peter Balint & Patti Tamara Lenard

PART I: Pro Multiculturalism
Patti Tamara Lenard
Chapter 1: Introduction to Part I
Chapter 2: What is Culture? Why Political Inclusion?
Chapter 3: Cultural Claims and Political Inclusion
Chapter 4: Cultural Preservation and Multicultural Accommodation
Chapter 5: Non-Interference and Political Inclusion
Chapter 6: Shared Public Culture in Diverse States

PART II: Against Multicultural Minority Rights
Peter Balint
Chapter 7: Introduction to Part II
Chapter 8: We are All Neutralists Now!
Chapter 9: Neutrality without Minority Rights
Chapter 10: National Minorities, Indigenous Peoples, and Historical Injustice
Chapter 11: Multiculturalism and the Demands on Citizens
Chapter 12: Conclusion to Part II

Part III: Responses
Chapter 13: Response to Balint
Culture not Colanders: Why Neutralism Fails to Respond Effectively to the Challenges of Cultural Diversity
Patti Tamara Lenard
Chapter 14: Response to Lenard
Multiculturalism without Minority (or Majority) Rights
Peter Balint