権力と正当性:EUと国民国家の規範的調和<br>Power and Legitimacy : Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State

個数:
  • ポイントキャンペーン

権力と正当性:EUと国民国家の規範的調和
Power and Legitimacy : Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 364 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780195390148
  • DDC分類 341.2422

基本説明

A novel legal-historical synthesis of European integration, grounded in an innovative theory of institutional change. Lindseth traces the many ways that the public law of European integration has built directly on the normative principles of the postwar settlement as well as its key legitimating structures.

Full Description

The implications of European integration for national democracy and constitutionalism are well known. Nevertheless, as the events of the last decade made clear, the EU's complex system of governance has been unable to achieve a democratic or constitutional legitimacy in its own right. In Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State, Peter L. Lindseth traces the roots of this paradox to integration's dependence on the postwar constitutional settlement of administrative governance on the national level.

Supranational policymaking has relied on various forms of oversight from national constitutional bodies, following models that were first developed in the administrative state and then translated into the European context. These national oversight mechanisms (executive, legislative, and judicial) have over the last half-century developed to address the central disconnect in the integration process: between the need for supranational regulatory power, on the one hand, and the persistence of national constitutional legitimacy, on the other. In defining the ways European public law has sought to reconcile these two conflicting demands, Professor Lindseth lays the foundation for a better understanding of the "administrative, not constitutional" nature of European governance going forward.

Contents

Preface

Citation Forms

Abbreviations

Introduction: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State
Representative Government, Democratic Legitimacy, and "Europe"
Administrative Governance and the Distinction between Control and Legitimation of Regulatory Power
National Legitimation and the Administrative Character of European Governance

1 Situating the Argument: Legal History, Institutional Change, and Integration Theory
1.1 Administrative Governance as an Alternative Analytical Framework
1.2 Delegation as a Normative-Legal Principle
1.3 The Importance of National Antecedents

2 The Interwar Crisis and the Postwar Constitutional Settlement of Administrative Governance
2.1 The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy and Lessons Learned
2.2 Elements of the Postwar Constitutional Settlement
Delegation and the Legislative Function Redefined
Technocracy and the Leadership of the National Executive
Courts as Commitment Mechanisms: Collective Democracy and Individual Rights
2.3 Mediated Legitimacy and the Conditions for Constitutional Stability in the Two Postwar Eras

3 Supranational Delegation and National Executive Leadership since the 1950s
3.1 A "New Deal" for Europe?: Technocratic Autonomy, the Treaty of Paris, and a National Executive Role
3.2 Toward National Executive Control?: Negotiating the Treaty of Rome
3.3 From Control to Oversight: the Luxembourg Compromise, the European Council, and Beyond

4 Supranational Delegation and National Judicial Review since the 1960s
4.1 The European Court of Justice and Judicially Sanctioned "Spill-over"
4.2 Defining National Judicial Deference to Supranational Delegation, 1960s-1980s
4.3 Defining the Limits of Strong Deference: Kompetenz-Kompetenz in the Constitutional Politics and Jurisprudence of the Last Two Decades

5 Supranational Delegation and National Parliamentary Scrutiny since the 1970s
5.1 The Pivotal Change: Subsidiarity and the Expansion of Supranational Regulatory Power after 1986
5.2 The Institutionalization of National Parliamentary Scrutiny under National Law since the 1970s
5.3 Toward a "Polycentric" Constitutional Settlement: National Parliaments and Subsidiarity under Supranational Law in the 2000s

Conclusion: The Challenge of Legitimizing "Europeanized" Administrative Governance
Beyond Delegation?: Density, Democracy, and Polycentric Constitutionalism
Legitimation and Control Revisited: Toward a European Conflicts Tribunal?
Sovereignty, the Nation-State, and Integration History

Bibliography

最近チェックした商品