憲法による正当化:政治的リベラリズムについての対話<br>Legitimation by Constitution : A Dialogue on Political Liberalism (Oxford Constitutional Theory)

個数:
電子版価格
¥16,060
  • 電子版あり

憲法による正当化:政治的リベラリズムについての対話
Legitimation by Constitution : A Dialogue on Political Liberalism (Oxford Constitutional Theory)

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版/ページ数 208 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780192855121
  • DDC分類 320.51

Full Description

"Legitimation by Constitution" is the phrase, coined by distinguished authors Frank Michelman and Alessandro Ferrara, for a key idea in Rawlsian political liberalism of a reliance on a dualist form of democracy-a subjection of ground-level lawmaking to the constraints of a higher-law constitution that most citizens could find acceptable as a framework for their politics-as a response to the problem of maintaining a liberally just, stable, and oppression-free democratic government in conditions of pluralist visionary conflict.

Legitimation by Constitution recalls, collects, and combines a series of exchanges over the years between Michelman and Ferrara, inspired by Rawls' encapsulation of this conception in his proposed liberal principle of legitimacy. From a shared standpoint of sympathetic identification with the political-liberal statement of the problem, for which legitimation by constitution is proposed as a solution, these exchanges consider the perceived difficulties arguably standing in the way of this proposal's fulfillment on terms consistent with political liberalism's defining ideas about political justification. The authors discuss the mysteries of a democratic constituent power; the tensions between government-by-the-people and government-by-consent; the challenges posed to concretization by judicial authorities of national constitutional law; and the magnification of these tensions and challenges under the lenses of ambition towards transnational legal ordering. These discussions engage with other leading contemporary theorists of liberal-democratic constitutionalism including Bruce Ackerman, Ronald Dworkin, and Jürgen Habermas.

Contents

Part I: Popular Sovereignty Versus Higher (and Higher) Law
1: "Always Under Law"
2: On the Paradox of Deliberative Democracy
3: The Challenge of "Most Reasonable for Us"
4: The "Most Reasonable for Us" or "Irrescusability" as Preserving Authenticity
Part II: A Democratic Horizon
5: Constitutional Interpretation: A Dualist Democrat's Dilemma
6: On Reconciling the Two Understandings of Judicial Review
7: Judicial Constitutional Application: A Rejoinder
8: Backgrounding the Debate: Judicial Occlusion and Remedial Strategies
Part III: Global Orders and Limits of Liberalism
9: Hyperpluralized Constituencies: The Challenge for Political Liberalism
10: Can Legitimation by Constitution Apply Beyond the State?
11: A Political Conception of People (and its Consequences)
12: From Decency to Democracy: Leading by Example
Conclusion
A Glance Back and the Road Ahead
A Liberal Limit to Constitutional Thinness

最近チェックした商品