偉大な判例は悪法をつくるか?<br>Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?

個数:

偉大な判例は悪法をつくるか?
Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?

  • 提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
    重要ご説明事項
    1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
    2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
    3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

    ●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて
  • 【入荷遅延について】
    世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
    おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。
  • ◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。
  • ◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
    また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
    ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。
  • 製本 Paperback:紙装版/ペーパーバック版/ページ数 454 p.
  • 言語 ENG
  • 商品コード 9780190840082
  • DDC分類 342.7300264

Full Description

"Great cases like hard cases make bad law" declared Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in his dissenting opinion in the Northern Securities antitrust case of 1904. His maxim argues that those cases which ascend to the Supreme Court of the United States by virtue of their national importance, interest, or other extreme circumstance, make for poor bases upon which to construct a general law. Frequently, such cases catch the public's attention because they raise important legal issues, and they become landmark decisions from a doctrinal standpoint. Yet from a practical perspective, great cases could create laws poorly suited for far less publicly tantalizing but far more common situations.

Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. tests Justice Holmes' dictum in Do Great Cases Make Bad Law? He analyzes in detail the history of the Supreme Court's great cases, from Marbury v. Madison in 1803, to National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act case in 2012. He treats each case with its own chapter, and explains why the Court found a case compelling, how the background and historical context affected the decision and its place in constitutional law and history, how academic scholarship has treated the case, and how the case integrates with and reflects off of Justice Holmes' famous statement. In doing so, Professor Bloom draws on the whole of the Supreme Court's decisional history to form an intricate scholarly understanding of the holistic significance of the Court's reasoning in American constitutional law.

Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction

1. Marbury v. Madison

2. McCulloch v. Maryland

3. Gibbons v. Ogden

4. Prigg v. Pennsylvania

5. Scott v. Sandford

6. The Legal Tender Cases

7. The Slaughter-House Cases

8. The Civil Rights Cases

9. Pollack v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

10. NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

11. Dennis v. United States

12. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer

13. Brown v. Board of Education

14. The Reapportionment Cases

15. New York Times v. Sullivan

16. Miranda v. Arizona

17. The Pentagon Papers Case

18. Roe and Casey

19. United States v. Nixon

20. Bakke, Grutter & Gratz (and Fisher)

21. Bush v. Gore

22. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

23. Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?

Index

最近チェックした商品