コンドルセのパラドクス（投票の逆理）：研究集成 Condorcet's Paradox (Theory and Decision Library Series C, Game Theory, Mathematical Programming, and Operations Research)

コンドルセのパラドクス（投票の逆理）：研究集成<br>Condorcet's Paradox (Theory and Decision Library Series C, Game Theory, Mathematical Programming, and Operations Research)

個数：

ポイントキャンペーン

コンドルセのパラドクス（投票の逆理）：研究集成
Condorcet's Paradox (Theory and Decision Library Series C, Game Theory, Mathematical Programming, and Operations Research)

Gehrlein, William V.

ウェブストア価格 ¥22,609（本体¥20,554）
Springer Verlag（2006/10発売）
外貨定価 US$ 109.99
【ウェブストア限定】サマー！ポイント5倍キャンペーン対象商品（～7/21）※店舗受取は対象外
ポイント 1,025pt

提携先の海外書籍取次会社に在庫がございます。通常3週間で発送いたします。
【重要ご説明事項】
1. 納期遅延や、ご入手不能となる場合が若干ございます。
2. 複数冊ご注文の場合は、ご注文数量が揃ってからまとめて発送いたします。
3. 美品のご指定は承りかねます。

●3Dセキュア導入とクレジットカードによるお支払いについて

【入荷遅延について】
世界情勢の影響により、海外からお取り寄せとなる洋書・洋古書の入荷が、表示している標準的な納期よりも遅延する場合がございます。
おそれいりますが、あらかじめご了承くださいますようお願い申し上げます。

◆画像の表紙や帯等は実物とは異なる場合があります。

◆ウェブストアでの洋書販売価格は、弊社店舗等での販売価格とは異なります。
また、洋書販売価格は、ご注文確定時点での日本円価格となります。
ご注文確定後に、同じ洋書の販売価格が変動しても、それは反映されません。

製本 Hardcover:ハードカバー版／ページ数 289 p.
言語 ENG
商品コード 9783540337980
DDC分類 330

基本説明

A compilation of the research that has been conducted in the study of Condorcet's Paradox for two centuries.

Full Description

Condorcet's Paradox has been formally studied by an amazing number of people in many different contexts for more than two centuries. Peter Fishburn introduced the basic notion of the Paradox to me in 1971 during a course in Social Choice Theory at Pennsylvania State University. My immediate response to seeing the simple example that he presented was that this phenomenon certainly could not be very likely to ever be observed in reality. Peter quickly suggested that I should work on developing some representations for the probability that the Paradox might occur, and very soon thereafter that pursuit began. It is only after 35 years of effort, with a lot of help from Peter, that I now feel that a good answer can be given to the challenge that was presented in that classroom in 1971. Many people have suggested to me over the years that a book like this should be completed, since the source material is spread over such a wide variety of disciplines of a- demic journals and books that it is very difficult for people to know what has been done, and has not been done, in this area of determining representations for the probability that Condorcet's Paradox would ever be observed in reality.

Elections and Voting Paradoxes.- Condorcet's Paradox.- The Cases of Two and Three Candidates.- The Case of More than Three Candidates.- The Impact of Societal Factors.- The Impact of Coherent Preferences.- Individual Intransitivity.